Skip to content

Testing PPC Sitelinks with Some Surprising Results

November 1, 2010

Since first learning about PPC Sitelinks earlier this year, I’ve become a BIG fan.

There are so many ways that you can use sitelinks to improve the targeting of those broader search terms and get people to where they want to be a lot quicker. For me, using sitelinks over the past six months has driven twice as many clicks at a fraction of the cost, compared to just using one bog-standard link. And post click, the conversions have been a lot higher too.

But the question is: How do you decide what sublinks to use? There are so many approaches and options to choose from, yet Google will only display four sublinks at a time (granted you can load in up to 10 and over time Google will display the best performing). But what if you want to know up front which sublinks will drive the best results? The answer — as always — is to test.

For searches in the US, I wanted to find out which would do better: A product focus (using product categories as sublinks) vs. targeting intent (using learn/buy/use related sublinks). What better way to find out than through an A/B test.

Prior to the test, my thoughts were that targeting intent would trump a basic product approach hands down. Boy, was I wrong. Results showed that the product focus outperformed the intent focus on the front-end, and then went on to crush it on the back-end with:

  • 5% more clicks
  • 8% better engagement on the site (measured by a weighted quality score)
  • 30% higher conversion

Now I’m not saying that these results ring true for everyone, not by any means. I guess my point is, there are theories out there as to what works and what doesn’t, and sometimes it can be dangerous to generalize.

I was convinced the intent approach was best, but simplicity won in the end. It just goes to show that nothing is certain until you test and tailor your approach specifically for your own business.

Advertisements

From → Search Marketing

6 Comments
  1. Nice article regarding sitelinks. Since the inception of this feature I have been a huge fan. I’m wondering if you can clarify this sentence a little more:

    “Results showed that the product focus outperformed the intent focus on the front-end, and then went on to crush it on the back-end with”

    Specifically, can you provide examples of what type of text and sitelinks (and landing pages) that you used? No need to provide the actual text of the ad, but some examples might help to better explain the data.

    Also, a technique I’ve tried with sitelinks is to create campaigns for the sole purpose of using sitelinks:

    http://theppcblog.com/2010/08/utilizing-google-adwords-sitelinks-my-way/

    Thanks for the sitelinks insight!

    -Matt

  2. Thanks for your comment, Matt. The example was from a B2B company who sell oscilloscopes (equipment used by engineers to test electronic designs). “Oscilloscope” is quite a broad category (there are many different kinds with many different price groups), similar to your “Men’s Sweatshirts” adgroup.

    The product sitelinks were:
    – Basic
    – Bench
    – Mixed Signal
    – Performance

    The intent sitelinks were:
    – View Tutorials
    – Arrange a Demo
    – Get a Quote
    – Download Manuals

    The product group pages showed the different models related to that sitelink and included a combination of learn/buy/use call to actions. The intent landing pages were more specific to the intent. As an example, the tutorials page was very “Learn” focused, offering a selection of popular whitepapers and primers.

    Also, thanks for sharing your work on the campaign vs. adgroup conundrum. I agree that this is definitely the way to go to improve relevance.

    Imelda

  3. I’m not sold, I’ve found customers wander around and don’t convert also feel that the site links take customers “off message” and distract from the intent.

  4. Thanks for your feedback, Jenna. It’s interesting to hear that you have not seen good results from sitelinks. I think this is why it’s so good to test, as results can definitely vary from business to business.

Trackbacks & Pingbacks

  1. Why PPC Re-Marketing is a Direct Marketer’s Dream « SEM Booty Blog
  2. The Best PPC Blogs – The Definitive List of Pay-Per Click Blogs

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: